The double exposures I did in a more urban setting didn’t work for me as well as the hike in the woods photos did. Going to post some of them anyway and see what others think.
I really like them, but I see what you mean about urban environments posing challenges. Sometimes the merge makes it hard for the eye to know where to start. I’ve only had two cups of coffee, so not wording that well. Looking forward to getting on a bigger screen and looking at that 3rd photo – I love how the bench shows up.
I’m biased in that I’d almost always rather look at photos of the natural world, but these are really interesting, too. I find myself wondering what would would happen if you blended the urban photos with the ones taken in the woods. (Don’t even know if that’s possible from a technical perspective, so I’m just doing it in my head.)
I agree, Chuck. My preference is ambiguity and abstraction. That’s the thing: draw the viewer in closer and longer.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I really like them, but I see what you mean about urban environments posing challenges. Sometimes the merge makes it hard for the eye to know where to start. I’ve only had two cups of coffee, so not wording that well. Looking forward to getting on a bigger screen and looking at that 3rd photo – I love how the bench shows up.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m biased in that I’d almost always rather look at photos of the natural world, but these are really interesting, too. I find myself wondering what would would happen if you blended the urban photos with the ones taken in the woods. (Don’t even know if that’s possible from a technical perspective, so I’m just doing it in my head.)
LikeLiked by 1 person